nursing multi-part question and need the explanation and answer to help me learn.
This assignment comes in 2 parts. Please submit 2 word document with each part answer. Follow the rubric
Part 1: NURS521
Write a 1-2 page essay addressing the discussion questions posed for the one video you selected. Be sure to clearly identify the news clipping you selected. (The transcript have been attached)
Adhere to current APA Style and cite all sources. Review the rubric for further information on how your assignment will be graded.
Find Out More: You may use these and other outside sources to frame your discussion.
The Pain of Wrong Site SurgeryLinks to an external site.
Judgment Upheld in Arkansas Brain Surgery LawsuitLinks to an external site.
National Quality ForumLinks to an external site.
Assignment Discussion Questions
Discuss the issues of integrity in this case.
Should criminal charges be considered in this case, if accurately reported? Discuss your answer.
Why did you choose to respond to this story?
How is integrity displayed in your clinical setting?
NURS_521_DE – Paper/Essay Rubric. Please follow the rubric for the grading criteria.
NURS_521_DE – Paper/Essay Rubric
Criteria Ratings Pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeContent
16 to >13.76 pts
Proficient
The writer clearly and effectively responds to the assignment.
13.76 to >12.0 pts
Approaches Proficiency
The response to the assignment is generally adequate, but may not be thorough.
12 to >0 pts
Does Not Meet Expectations
The writer does not respond to the assignment.
16 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeFocus and Detail
12 to >10.32 pts
Proficient
There is one clear, well-focused topic. Main ideas are clear and are well supported by detailed and accurate information.
10.32 to >9.0 pts
Approaches Proficiency
There is one clear, well-focused topic. Main ideas are clear but are not well supported by detailed information.
9 to >0 pts
Does Not Meet Expectations
The topic and main ideas are not clear.
12 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeOrganization
8 to >6.88 pts
Proficient
The introduction is inviting, states the main topic, and provides an overview of the paper. Information is relevant and presented in a logical order. The conclusion is strong.
6.88 to >6.0 pts
Approaches Proficiency
The introduction states the main topic and provides an overview of the paper. A conclusion is included.
6 to >0 pts
Does Not Meet Expectations
There is no clear introduction, structure, or conclusion.
8 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeMechanics and APA
4 to >3.44 pts
Proficient
The assignment consistently follows current APA format and is free from errors in formatting, citation, and references. No grammatical, spelling, or punctuation errors. All sources are cited and referenced correctly.
3.44 to >3.0 pts
Approaches Proficiency
The assignment consistently follows current APA format with only isolated and inconsistent mistakes and/or has a few grammatical, spelling, or punctuation errors. Most sources are cited and referenced correctly.
3 to >0 pts
Does Not Meet Expectations
The assignment does not follow current APA format and/or has many grammatical, spelling, or punctuation errors. Many sources are cited and referenced incorrectly, or citations and references are missing.
4 pts
Total Points:40
PART 2: NURS535 Personal Philosophy of Teaching Part I
Personal Philosophy of Teaching Assignment Directions
This week, you will develop your personal philosophy of teaching in a written statement, articulating your beliefs about important educational theories and practices. Your teaching philosophy should be based on what is meaningful to you in your approach to teaching.
Note: As your experiences and beliefs about teaching grow and change, your philosophy will also change. Therefore, at the end of this course, you will submit your revised teaching philosophy with a brief discussion of how your philosophy has changed or developed during this course.
There is no right or wrong way to write a personal teaching philosophy. However, for the purpose of this assignment, please follow the assignment guidelines below to connect your beliefs, goals, and strategies into a coherent approach to help students learn and grow.
Assignment Guidelines
Philosophy Paper Requirements
The paper should be 2–4 pages, typed in Times New Roman using 12-point font, and double-spaced with 1″ margins.
Use a first person narrative and present tense.
Write sincerely, uniquely, and memorably. Avoid clichés, jargon, and technical terms.
Include specific (not abstract) ideas, using 1–2 concrete examples, whether actual or anticipated experiences.
Show humility and mention students enthusiastically.
Include your conception of how learning occurs.
Communicate your goals as an instructor.
Include actual or anticipated teaching strategies and methods.
Include justification for why you teach (or anticipate teaching) the way you do.
Include a brief discussion of how your teaching (or anticipated teaching) facilitates student learning.
Include a conclusion.
To assist you in developing your teaching philosophy, you may choose to include any or all of the following:
Famous quotes
Your personal experiences as a learner
Your views of the educational system
Your interest in new types of teaching and learning
What you think students should expect from you as a teacher
How you know your goals for students are being met
How you create (or anticipate creating) an engaging or enriching learning environment, and specific activities or exercises to engage your students
NURS_535_DE – NURS535 Personal Philosophy of Teaching Part I
NURS_535_DE – NURS535 Personal Philosophy of Teaching Part I
Criteria Ratings Pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeOverall Teaching Philosophy
25 to >19.75 ptsAccomplishedPhilosophy paper is personal, mentions students in a positive manner, and clearly indicates a personal viewpoint on teaching. 19.75 to >14.75 ptsEmergingPhilosophy paper is somewhat personal, somewhat mentions students in a positive manner, and somewhat indicates a personal viewpoint on teaching. 14.75 to >0 ptsUnsatisfactoryPhilosophy paper is not personal, fails to mention students in a generally positive manner, and a personal viewpoint on teaching is absent or severely lacking in detail.
25 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeInstructor Goals/Strategies
25 to >19.75 ptsAccomplishedGoals as an instructor are clearly identified. Actual or anticipated teaching strategies/methods are clearly indicated. 19.75 to >14.75 ptsEmergingGoals as an instructor are somewhat identified. Actual or anticipated teaching strategies/methods are included but not clearly indicated. 14.75 to >0 ptsUnsatisfactoryGoals as an instructor are absent or significantly lacking. Actual or anticipated teaching strategies/methods are absent or unclear.
25 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeOverall Teaching Strategy
25 to >19.75 ptsAccomplishedA clear explanation on why you teach and how your teaching facilitates student learning is included. 19.75 to >14.75 ptsEmergingAn explanation on why you teach and how your teaching facilitates student learning is included, but is not clearly indicated. 14.75 to >0 ptsUnsatisfactoryAn explanation on why you teach and how your teaching facilitates student learning is absent or is significantly lacking in details and relevance.
25 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeConclusion
15 to >11.85 ptsAccomplishedConclusion brings together the philosophy paper and includes a brief summary of the overall points in the paper. 11.85 to >8.85 ptsEmergingConclusion is included, but does not fully tie together the philosophy paper and bring together the overall points in the paper. 8.85 to >0 ptsUnsatisfactoryConclusion is absent, or does not fully tie together the philosophy paper or bring together the overall points in the paper.
15 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeOrganization, Writing, & APA
10 to >7.9 ptsAccomplishedPaper is approximately 2-4 double spaced pages in length. Current APA Style is followed and written in APA formal letter format. Written in a clear, concise, formal, and organized manner. Information from sources is paraphrased appropriately and accurately cited. 7.9 to >5.9 ptsEmergingPaper is approximately 1-5 double spaced pages in length. Current APA Style is mostly followed. Writing is generally clear and organized but is not concise or formal in language. Multiple errors exist in spelling and grammar with minor interference with readability or comprehension. Most information from sources is paraphrased and cited correctly. 5.9 to >0 ptsUnsatisfactoryPaper may be significantly more or less than 2-4 pages in length. Current APA Style may not be followed. Writing is generally unclear and unorganized. Errors in spelling and grammar detract from readability and comprehension. Sources are missing or improperly cited.
10 pts
Total Points: 100
Requirements: as instructed
#1 Wrong Operation Doctor (ethics and integrity) Hospitals find it hard to protect patients from wrong-site surgery. Last year a jury returned a $20 million negligence verdict against Arkansas ChildrenÕs Hospital for surgery performed on the wrong side of the brain of a 15-year-old boy who was left psychotic and severely brain damaged. Testimony showed that the error was not disclosed to his parents for more than a year. The hospital issued a statement saying it deeply regretted the error and had Òredoubled our efforts to preventÓ a recurrence. So, what happened? ÒHealth care has far too little accountability for results … . All the pressures are on the side of production; thatÕs how you get paid,Ó said Peter Pronovost, a prominent safety expert and medical director of the Johns Hopkins Center for Innovation in Quality Patient Care. He added that increased pressure to quickly turn over operating rooms has trumped patient safety, increasing the chance of error. Kenneth W. Kizer, who coined the term Ònever eventÓ nearly a decade ago when he headed the National Quality Forum, a leading patient safety organization, said he believes reducing the number of errors will require tougher reporting rules and increased transparency. Source: Boodman, S.G. (2011). Kaiser Health News,The Washington Post. Pozgar, 4th ed., p. 43 (integrity)