writing case study and need the explanation and answer to help me learn.
CASESTUDYASSIGNMENTINSTRUCTIONS
OVERVIEW
Each Case Study Assignment is designed to help you make application of course content to the
area of fire and emergency services administration by studying real-world incidents involving the
fire service and decisions made during the response to those incidents.
INSTRUCTIONS
You will be required to identify and write a critique of 2 case studies. Each case study critique
will be at least three pages in length, must discuss the major facts of the case, and must tell
whether you believe the right decision(s) was/were made and why. The format of each case
study must be as follows:
Identify the important facts in the case study.
What decision(s) were made in the case study
Do you believe the decisions were appropriate?
Discuss any alternative solution(s) to the problem and support those solutions with
additional research. Make sure your solutions are relevant to the case and able to be
implemented.
Conclusion
References (You must cite at least 3 scholarly sources reflecting diverse viewpoints and
germane research.)
Make sure each section is labelled appropriately (Facts, Decision, Solution, and
Conclusion)
Citation Style: Current APA format
All papers must use the following format: Times New Roman, 12-point font, 1” margins
from left to right and top to bottom, double spaced, number pages and include a title
page.
Review the grading rubric for all content- and presentation-related graded criteria.
Requirements: 5 pages, APA format
Case Study Assignment Instructions
Overview
Each Case Study Assignment is designed to help you make application of course content to the area of fire and emergency services administration by studying real-world incidents involving the fire service and decisions made during the response to those incidents.
Instructions
You will be required to identify and write a critique of 2 case studies. Each case study critique will be at least three pages in length, must discuss the major facts of the case, and must tell whether you believe the right decision(s) was/were made and why. The format of each case study must be as follows:
Identify the important facts in the case study.
What decision(s) were made in the case study
Do you believe the decisions were appropriate?
Discuss any alternative solution(s) to the problem and support those solutions with additional research. Make sure your solutions are relevant to the case and able to be implemented.
Conclusion
References (You must cite at least 3 scholarly sources reflecting diverse viewpoints and germane research.)
Make sure each section is labelled appropriately (Facts, Decision, Solution, and Conclusion)
Citation Style: Current APA format
All papers must use the following format: Times New Roman, 12-point font, 1” margins from left to right and top to bottom, double spaced, number pages and include a title page.
Review the grading rubric for all content- and presentation-related graded criteria.
Note: Your assignment will be checked for originality via the Turnitin plagiarism tool.
CriteriaRatingsPointsResearchPurpose30 to >26 ptsAdvancedPresents accurate anddetailed descriptions of theproblems and issues centralto the case; provides awell-focused analysis ofstrategic issues and keyproblems that demonstratesan excellent grasp of thesituation and strategicchallenges; descriptions arecompelling and insightful;provides a through andeffective executive summary.26 to >20 ptsProficientWith a few exceptions,identifies and outlines theprincipal problems andissues in the case;demonstrates anacceptable understandingof the issues, currentsituation, and strategicchallenges; summaryprovides an adequateoverview of the caseissues and problems;summary is missing a fewminor points, but meetsexpectations20 to >0 ptsDevelopingThe research questionrequires significantclarification andprominence throughoutthe paper. Introductionmay be missing orambiguous. Some necessaryaspects of theassignment described inthe instructions areclearly identifiable, butothers may requireclarification ordevelopment.Organization mayrequire significantimprovement.0 ptsNotPresentNotPresent30 ptsReasonedAnalysis30 to >26 ptsAdvancedPresents a balanced,in-depth, and criticalassessment of the facts ofthe case consideringrelevant empirical andtheoretical research;develops insightful andwell-supported conclusionsusing reasoned, sounds, andinformed judgements.26 to >3 ptsProficientProvides an acceptableanalysis of most of theissues and problem in thecase; in most instances,analysis is an adequatelysupported by theory;appropriate conclusionsare outlined andsummarized.3 to >0 ptsDevelopingSimply repeats factsidentified in the caseand does not discussthe relevance of thesefacts; fails to drawconclusions, orconclusions are notjustified or supported;does not presentrelevant research;shows no criticalexamination of caseissues.0 ptsNotPresentNotPresent30 ptsScholarlySupport10 to >8 ptsAdvancedAt least 3 scholarly sourcesreflecting diverse viewpointsand germane research areemployed. Source materialis properly attributed.8 to >6 ptsProficientSomeimprovements/additions toquality/quantity of sourcesare needed. Clarification ofsource material may beneeded.6 to >0 ptsDevelopingSignificant improvementof scholarly support(sources, table/figurerequirements) isneeded. Sourcematerial may not beproperly attributed.0 ptsNotPresentNotPresent10 ptsCase Study Grading Rubric | FIRE340_D01_202340
CriteriaRatingsPointsCompositionandReadability17 to >14 ptsAdvancedRules of grammar, usage,and punctuation arefollowed, and spelling iscorrect. Sentences arecomplete, clear and concise.Rhetorical skill is shown.Sentences are wellconstructed, withconsistently strong andvaried structure. Sentencetransitions are present anddirect the flow of thought. Paragraph transitions arepresent and logical, directingflow of thought throughoutthe paper. Grading feedback andlessons from applicablemodule: week are fullyaddressed/incorporated.14 to >11 ptsProficientPaper contains minimalerrors in grammar, usage,punctuation and spelling. Sentences are generallycomplete, clear andconcise. Rhetorical skill isshown, although a fewPoints: may requireclarification. Somevariation in sentencestructure or transitionsmay be required toimprove flow ofdiscussion. Someparagraph transitions mayrequire improvement. Grading feedback andlessons from applicablemodule: week aregenerally addressed/incorporated.11 to >0 ptsDevelopingPaper containsnumerous errors ingrammar, usage,punctuation andspelling. Multiplesentences may beincomplete orambiguously worded.Sentence transitionsmay be weak,insufficiently directingthe flow of thought. Grading feedback andlessons from applicablemodule: week areinsufficientlyaddressed/incorporated.0 ptsNotPresentNotPresent17 ptsFormatting7 to >6 ptsAdvancedPaper is laid out effectivelyand uses reader-friendly aids(e.g., section subheadings,table of contents, indices,appendices, etc.) asappropriate. Text, citations and Referencepage(s) follow current APAstyle/format requirements. Paper is written in 12-pointTimes New Roman font, isdouble-spaced, and has 1”margins.6 to >4 ptsProficientPaper is generally laid outeffectively and uses somereader-friendly aids asappropriate. Text, citations andReference page(s)contains minimalinconsistencies withcurrent APA style/formatrequirements. Paper may contain someinconsistencies withrequired font, spacing andmargin requirements.4 to >0 ptsDevelopingPaper may be laid outineffectively or may notuse sufficientreader-friendly aids asappropriate. Text, citations and/orReference page(s) donot follow current APAstyle/formatrequirements. Paper may not followrequired font, spacingand marginrequirements.0 ptsNotPresentNotPresent7 ptsPageLength6 to >5 ptsAdvancedRequired page length of atleast 3, excluding title page,reference page, tables andfigures, is met.5 to >3 ptsProficientRequired page length maynot be met.3 to >0 ptsDevelopingPage length may besignificantly short ofrequirement.0 ptsNotPresentNotPresent6 ptsTotal Points: 100Case Study Grading Rubric | FIRE340_D01_202340